I am told that it will soon be for sale online (along with other "underground" materials) from E-Logic ( nxtc@midusa.net ); they are licensing it from Barricade Books. If you're looking for a free copy of the real Anarchist Cookbook, note that this would technically illegal, as it is a copyrighted book. More to the point, it's unlikely you'll be able to find it; I've never found it online despite extensive searching (although http://ntas-edu.cudenver.

The Original Anarchist Cookbook was a book published in 1971. You won't find this original book online. There are various files available on the Internet that have the name "Anarchist Cookbook" and have somewhat similar content, bu-t they are not the original Anarchist Cookbook. There are also other files that do contain parts of the content from The Anarchist Cookbook, often mixed with other material.

The Anarchist Cookbook, by William Powell, is a 160 page book, originally published in 1971 by Lyle Stuart. It is currently published by Barricade Books under ISBN 0-9623032-0-8. (Note that the name is not the "Anarchist's Cookbook"; there is no possessive in the name.) The table of contents should give an idea of what the book is about: A prefatory note on Anarchism today by P. M. Bergman Chapter 1: Drugs From pot to hydrangea leaves.

Well, there are two versions of this answer, the short answer and the long answer. The short answer that you will see here and there is "the anarchist cookbook is rubbish, don't trust it" and that's about as much info as they can give you. The long answer, which I am going to give you will explain the source of this document, and how it came to be so famous.

Well, arguably not a hell of a lot. Anarchism is an extremely personal topic and one which I don't dare to philosophize about. Some anarchists like to more closely align themselves with peace and freedom while some are all about active protest and causing mayhem. There are many sites out there where you can learn more about anarchism without the anarchist cookbook: Anarchy for Anybody: Anarchism does not mean bloodshed; it does not mean robbery, arson, etc.

No. According to people who know explosives, it contains many dangerous errors and formulas that are likely to hurt you. People strongly advise to stay away from it if you enjoy having your limbs. If you want to read it just for entertainment, however, go ahead. I thought it was rather silly and contained a lot of tedious 60's political rhetoric. I'd suggest saving your money, but buy it if you want.

Look, if you want to make bombs, you need more than some crappy unreliable manual you got off the internet, no mater what manual it may be. By saying "bombs" I'll presume your talking about fire crackers or basically fireworks of some description. You need proper knowledge of the dangers and risks associated with building such devices. Of course building any type of device using more than about half an asprin of powder is illegal without the proper authorization.

Some people claim that the CIA/FBI/author/whoever sabotaged the Anarchist Cookbook to blow up would-be anarchists or to make the recipes fail. However, there is little evidence to support this theory. I find it much more likely that the errors are just due to incompetence. Note that many of the above errors (e.g. wrong symbol for arsenic, wrong formula for alcohol) don't sabotage anything but are just stupid errors.

Yes and No. If you are looking for a specific topic that The Anarchist Cookbook includes then you will find many sites dedicated to the indervidual subjects like: The largest site that encompasses all of these subjects and more would be http://www.nodoze.net/ but simply using well structured keywords on http://www.google.com/ will yield some good results. for a single document that deals with everything, I wouldn't waste your time. These online books are rubbish - period.

No. If you want to know why, see our Anarchist Cookbook page. We are compiling a cookbook of food recipes, but if you want that crappy book, contact your local bookstore. The Anarchist Cookbook has nothing to do with anarchy, which is why we can't help you. Please don't bother to send us email saying that we are gay. We hear that lame insult all the time.

The words net.goth in lower case should be written on them somewhere. The jacket arm just below the shoulder is recommended by Sexbat (but he may be teasing you - be warned :-)

Heavens no! I appreciate good government which stays within the lawful bounds of Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution. Good faith is everything. Government can never be assumed to have it, so always keep checking.

NET is a general-purpose software development platform, similar to Java. At its core is a virtual machine that turns intermediate language (IL) into machine code. High-level language compilers for C#, VB.NET and C++ are provided to turn source code into IL. C# is a new programming language, very similar to Java.

These questions belong in news.config (if anywhere), but in fact your best bet is usually to phone somebody at "foo" to find out. If you don't know anybody at "foo" you can always try calling and asking for the "comp center." Also, see the newsgroup comp.mail.maps where maps of Usenet and the uucp network are posted regularly. If you have access to telnet, connect to ds.internic.net and try the "whois" command. (See also the answer to question #7, below.)

Costs of I-Nets for which the cable operator does not otherwise receive reimbursement are generally subject to pass-through to subscribers, but this is a matter for negotiation between the cable operator and the local government.

No, not necessarily. We're not going to debate labels, unless we are going to subject classify this page. But seriously, these pages and the list are for radical librarians who are anarchistic. They are concerned with social responsibilities and the growing corporate control over information, among many things.

A: You need to use the mail package option to get mail transport specific information in the XI payload. In SP14, there will be a new mechanism to transport transport specific information for all adapters.

If you would like to support The Congo Cookbook you can make a direct contribution by way of the Amazon Honor System. Click on the "Click to Give" button to get started. Amazon will send the money to The Congo Cookbook, and you will remain anonymous. (And you will be able to download the recipes PDF file described above.) You can also buy any item from The Congo Cookbook Shop. Just giving a few dollars or buying an item or two helps a lot.

Yes. As a new shareholder, you will be assessed a $16 new member fee to cover the cost of a cookbook that includes recipes for using your produce, tips for seasonal eating, and basic information about CSA. In past years, we have used the Madison Area CSA Coalition Cookbook, From Asparagus to Zucchini. In 2004, we began using Recipes from America's Small Farms: Fresh Ideas for the Season's Bounty by Joanne Hayes.

To get your own personal Cookbook you must be a registered user. (See "How to Register") Once you have registered, a personal Cookbook is automatically created for you. You may add any recipe to Your Cookbook by first clicking on the recipe's title to view the detail page. You will then be given the option to save recipes.

Mr. Jacques resisted this idea, afraid that children would wander off in the woods and find something dangerous to eat, but now it sounds as if there will indeed be a Redwall cookbook. Stay tuned for updates.

Check out "Dear Emily Postnews" available at [http://www.clari.net/brad/emily.html], for a general (and satirical) look at Net-Etiquette. It is much more in depth than this FAQ can be. While most of "Dear Emily" relates to Usenet posting, it is still generally applicable to all Net writing.

Yes, you can base it on a photograph you have or give me a clear description of what you would like.. for example if you want a certain breed of dog, cat, or other animal - even a dragon or faerie art card for your collection.

Bill Gates delivered a keynote at Forum 2000, held June 22, 2000, outlining the .NET 'vision'. The July 2000 PDC had a number of sessions on .NET technology, and delegates were given CDs containing a pre-release version of the .NET framework/SDK and Visual Studio.NET.

The final versions of the 1.0 SDK and runtime were made publicly available around 6pm PST on 15-Jan-2002. At the same time, the final version of Visual Studio.NET was made available to MSDN subscribers. NET 2.0 was released to MSDN subscribers in late October 2005, and was officially launched in early November.

I don't know what they were thinking. They certainly weren't thinking of people using search tools. It's meaningless marketing nonsense.