This is actually a complicated question, because the term "libertarianism" itself has two very different meanings. In Europe in the 19th-century, libertarianism was a popular euphemism for left-anarchism. However, the term did not really catch on in the United States. After World War II, many American-based pro-free-market intellectuals opposed to traditional conservatism were seeking for a label to describe their position, and eventually picked "libertarianism.

While it is not specifically limited to governmental rulers, conventionally it has only been used to criticize the rulers of the most influential body, which is generally the government of a nation. Technically it could be used against all kinds of rulers: religious, economic, social or even familial heads of household. Anarchism is not one monogamous ideology, rather it is a collection of similar ideologies.

If we accept one traditional definition of socialism -- "advocacy of government ownership of the means of production" -- it seems that anarchists are not socialists by definition. But if by socialism we mean something more inclusive, such as "advocacy of the strong restriction or abolition of private property," then the question becomes more complex. Under the second proffered definition, some anarchists are socialists, but others are not.

I can attest to this question since it was asked of me when I deputized myself as a member of the House of Representatives. The non-anarchists were insisting that I had to be voted into the position so I did the vote thing and found myself in front of a bunch of people asking questions.

If you don't pay your taxes, men with guns will show up at your house, initiate force and put you in jail.

Well, arguably not a hell of a lot. Anarchism is an extremely personal topic and one which I don't dare to philosophize about. Some anarchists like to more closely align themselves with peace and freedom while some are all about active protest and causing mayhem. There are many sites out there where you can learn more about anarchism without the anarchist cookbook: Anarchy for Anybody: Anarchism does not mean bloodshed; it does not mean robbery, arson, etc.

It’s Blogtimore, Hon. We’re a sort of meta-site; a blog of blogs. When you sign up to join our community, we use your XML feed (what’s that?) to aggregate your content with everyone else. Not exactly. The only thing you’ll see on Blogtimore, Hon is what you’ve chosen to syndicate, or share with others. If you’d like to only include your headlines, that’s fine. If you’d like to include the entire text of your articles, go for it.

Defensio is developed by Karabunga Inc., a web development shop which operates out of a old tobacco factory just outside of Montreal, Canada.

Modern libertarianism has multiple roots. Perhaps the oldest is the minimal-government republicanism of the U.S.'s founding revolutionaries, especially Thomas Jefferson and the Anti-Federalists. Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill and the "classical liberals" of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries were another key influence. More recently, Ayn Rand's philosophy of "ethical egoism" and the Austrian School of free-market capitalist economics have both contributed important ideas.

There are a number of standard questions about libertarianism that have been periodically resurfacing in the politics groups for years. This posting attempts to answer some of them. I make no claim that the answers are complete, nor that they reflect a (nonexistent) unanimity among libertarians; the issues touched on here are tremendously complex.

Modern civilization faces three potentially catastrophic crises: (1) social breakdown, a shorthand term for rising rates of poverty, homelessness, crime, violence, alienation, drug and alcohol abuse, social isolation, political apathy, dehumanization, the deterioration of community structures of self-help and mutual aid, etc.

An anarchist society, lacking any central coercive authority, would quickly degenerate into violent chaos."

Further, rebirth is a necessity for the soul's evolution. Perfection cannot be achieved in one birth. Even to develop some cardinal virtues it might take several births. If you wish to attain Self-realization, you have to achieve perfection in all the virtues. You have to achieve perfect self-purification. So, rebirth is a necessity for the Jiva's (individual soul's) evolution.

Fleece can be washed by machine — low temperature water is best. Turn it inside out first, if possible. Allow to air dry (it won’t take long.) Faux fur should first be shaken out, then can be machine or handwashed in cold water, and air dried. Using any heat with faux fur will cause it to matt up permanently, so stick to cold! Once it’s dry you can shake it out to fluff it up.

Some organisations sent in their information in their own language of service, which is just great! I'd like to translate the whole thing, starting with French and Spanish, and then moving on to other languages. If you want to include your organisation's description in languages other than English, please feel free to do so!

Unless you find a section that says otherwise, this document is the product of one Nate Waddoups, a heli flyer in Bellevue Washington USA.

Guerrilla gardening and its related varieties that have sprung up in various places, is nothing more than an offshoot of the old utopian idea of changing society by example." Actually, it was a specific demonstration to encourage people to get involved in collective action, to have a good time and challenge authority and the status quo.

Yes, we enjoy coming up with new ways to deploy explosives. We are also members of the Society for Creative Acronyms.

One of the most common Marxist techniques when they discuss anarchism is to contrast the likes of Bakunin and Kropotkin to the revolutionary syndicalists. The argument runs along the lines that "classical" anarchism is individualistic and rejects working class organisation and power and syndicalism is a step forward from it (i.e. a step closer to Marxism). Sadly, such arguments simply show the ignorance of the author rather than any form of factual basis.

The two concepts are incompatible. Individualism holds that all individuals have the right to pursue their own happiness as they see fit. However, an individual may not pursue happiness by denying another, through the use of force, the ability to pursue his. Thus, a system of law defending individual rights is essential to the preservation of a free society. Anarchy repudiates the rule of law, and therefore repudiates individual rights.

Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven. That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. By him therefore let us offer the sacrifice of praise to God continually, that is, the fruit of our lips giving thanks to his name.