How do I get out of the lawsuit?
Bridgeport Fire Litigation - Class ActionTo exclude yourself from the lawsuit, you must complete an “Opt-Out Form” and send it by mail to the following address postmarked no later than June 1, 2006. You cannot exclude yourself over the phone, by e-mail or by any other means. You can obtain an “Opt-Out Form” by clicking here.
Related QuestionsEvenheat SettlementPlaintiff alleges that the electronic control boards on some Evenheat dryers contain a defect that has caused some of those dryers to malfunction both within the one-year written warranty period and after the warranty period.Related Questions
The Local 3 (IBEW) Antitrust ActionIn summary, the complaint alleges a conspiracy among Local 3 and several electrical contractors to eliminate competition by the plaintiffs in the market for telecommunications installation in the New York City metropolitan area.Related Questions
GlaxoSmithKline SettlementPlaintiffs allege that Defendant drug companies either report the AWP of each drug they make to trade publications or provide those publications with information from which the publications calculate an AWP for each of Defendants' drugs. The published AWP of a drug has been used to set the price that consumers who made Medicare Part B co-payments, and Medicare paid for the drug.Related Questions
Kmart Retirement Plan Settlement Litigation - FAQIn a Complaint filed in 2002 and subsequently amended, Rankin alleged that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties under ERISA by, among other things, failing to disclose certain facts about Kmart and the Kmart Stock Fund, which were offered as an investment option under the Plans and by allowing investment in options which should not have been offered.Related Questions
MSN Class Action WebsiteThis lawsuit is about whether Microsoft and Best Buy engaged in unfair business practices, in violation of Washington State law, in connection with the promotion of MSN Internet access service subscriptions at Best Buy stores. From 2000 to 2004, Microsoft and Best Buy promoted Microsoft's MSN Internet access service at Best Buy stores by offering MSN subscriptions with free-trial periods that ranged from one month to one year.Related Questions
Electronic Data SystemsThis case was brought as a class action alleging that Defendants violated the securities laws by making materially false and misleading statements and omissions regarding EDS's revenues and profitability during the period from February 7, 2001 through and including September 18, 2002. Defendants have denied that they did anything wrong.Related Questions
Hungarian Gold Train SettlementIn 2001, plaintiffs, for themselves and on behalf of all persons who have claimed or at any time could claim any interest in the personal property contained on the Hungarian Gold Train, filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against the United States Government. The case is entitled Rosner, et al. v. United States of America, Docket No. 01-1859-CIV-SEITZ. Federal District Judge Patricia A. Seitz is presiding over this class action.Related Questions
Relafen Class Action Ligitation Information WebsiteRelafen® is a brand name drug of a class of drugs known as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, or NSAID. It is generally prescribed for such conditions as chronic arthritis. A number of consumers and Third-Party Payors (such as insurance companies and employee benefit plans) filed class action lawsuits against Defendants GlaxoSmithKline PLC, SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, Beecham Group PLC and SmithKline Beecham, PLC.Related Questions
FAQsOn December 17, 2002, four persons with disabilities who use wheelchairs or scooters for mobility filed a class action lawsuit in federal court in San Francisco called Moeller v. Taco Bell Corp. Their suit charges that Taco Bell corporate restaurants in California have barriers that prevent customers who use wheelchairs or scooters from the full, independent and equal enjoyment of Defendant's goods and services.Related Questions
Masonite OmniwoodIn 1997, Jeff Cosby and other homeowners filed a lawsuit called Cosby, et al. v. Masonite Corp., et al., No. CV98-2446.Related Questions
Frequently Asked QuestionsCurrent and former Latino and African-American FedEx Express employees filed a class action lawsuit in federal court in San Francisco called Satchell et al. v. FedEx Express. The lawsuit alleged that FedEx Express discriminated within its Western Region against African-American and Latino hourly employees with respect to promotions, compensation, and discipline and against African-American operations managers with respect to compensation and discipline.Related Questions
The Law Offices of Harvey Sohnen | FAQ | Wrongful Terminatio...Normally, the only remedy a wrongfully terminated employee receives is an award of money damages, which may include contributions into pension accounts as well as back pay and payments for general damages. As a general rule, courts do not reinstate persons to their former jobs. Although money cannot necessarily compensate for all the harm done, it is the most practical method which our system provides for recompense.Related Questions
Maytag® Front-Load Washing Machine Settlement-Frequently...This lawsuit alleges that owners of Maytag® Neptune® Front-Load Washing Machines have claims concerning the door latch, wax motor, motor control and related circuit board failures, causing the machines to function improperly and users to experience odor, mold and mildew. They are asking the Court for repayment of the money spent to purchase and/or repair their Neptune® washers or damages equal to the diminished value of their appliances.Related Questions
American Cemwood Roofing Litigation SettlementPlaintiffs allege that Defendants failed to design, manufacture and test the Cemwood Shakes adequately before selling them as durable and suitable roofing products. As a result, Plaintiffs and the Class have experienced continuous and progressive damage to their property. Defendants have denied and continue to deny each and every allegation.Related Questions
Health and Sport, LLC v. Symantec CorporationIf you purchased Symantec's Norton AntiVirus 2004, also known as NAV 2004, software package and / or Symantec's Norton Internet Security 2004, also known as NIS 2004, software package between January 1, 2003 and January 3, 2006, manufactured by Defendant, Symantec Corporation, this lawsuit may be important to you.Related Questions
Vatican Bank ClaimsIn 1998 the US State Department issued a report implicating the Vatican in the 1945 disappearance of the Treasury of the Nazi Puppet State of Croatia. The purpose of this lawsuit is to obtain legal accounting of the missing funds, recover assets and distribute them to survivors and their descendants.Related Questions
Have you ever had a lawsuit?
The Marketing Audit - Your Business Intelligence Resource fo...We subscribe to and go beyond the SCIP (Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals) code of ethics. Since our inception in 1984, we have never had a lawsuit.
Related QuestionsBAR/BRI Class Action LitigationThe plaintiffs are the class of persons who paid for a full-service BAR/BRI bar review course in the United States from August 1, 1997 through and including July 31, 2006. West Publishing Corporation, the owner of BAR/BRI, is a defendant. The other defendant is Kaplan, Inc. BAR/BRI provides bar review courses throughout the United States, which assist law students in their preparation for taking one or more bar examinations.Related Questions
Fresco v. Automotive Directions, Inc. Class Action Settlemen...Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit claiming that Defendants knowingly obtained, used, or disclosed Personal Information and Highly Restricted Personal Information from motor vehicle records in violation of a federal statute known as the Driver's Privacy Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. ?? 2721-2725 ("DPPA"). The case is Fresco, et al. v. Automotive Directions, Inc., et al., No 03-61063-CIV-MARTINEZ, pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.Related Questions
Frequently Asked Questions Chamberlan v. Ford SettlementThe Class Vehicles were equipped with an engine that contained an air intake manifold made entirely from a nylon-composite material. The plaintiffs in these class action lawsuits allege that the coolant crossover passage of these intake manifolds may crack, resulting in coolant leakage, and that Ford violated state law because it failed to disclose this fact to consumers who bought Class Vehicles. Ford denies these allegations and any wrongdoing.Related Questions
How soon after I am injured do I have to file a lawsuit?
Frequently Asked Questions about Soft Tissue InjuriesEvery state has certain time limits, called "statutes of limitations," which govern the amount of time you have to file a personal injury lawsuit. In some states, you may have as little as one year to file a lawsuit arising out of an automobile accident. If you miss the deadline for filing your case, your claim may be dismissed by the court. Consequently, it is important to talk with a lawyer as soon as you receive or discover an injury.
Related QuestionsWhat was the Saipan lawsuit you and other retailers were involved in about?
Gap Inc. - Social Responsibility - Frequently Asked Question...In January 1999, a U.S. federal class-action lawsuit was filed against 18 apparel retailers, including Gap Inc., that purchased merchandise made in Saipan. The lawsuit alleged poor factory conditions and mistreatment of workers. We strongly believe that the allegations against us were without merit. One of our primary objections was being included in a class action lawsuit that treated all retailers and all factories the same. Every factory is different, in Saipan and elsewhere.
Related QuestionsWhat's this lawsuit about?
Survey and Manage Background: "Look Before You Log" FAQ &...ONRC Action v. US Forest Service is about the failure of the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to fulfill the promises made in 1994 to survey and protect rare species. The lawsuit also seeks a comprehensive review of the forest plan to consider new information about the effect of the forest plan on threatened salmon, water quality, and changes made to the plan since it was approved in 1994.
Related QuestionsHow much money did you ask for in the lawsuit?
Ban Trans Fats: The Campaign to Ban Partially Hydrogenated O...Zero dollars and zero cents. We simply asked for an injunction ordering Kraft "after the expiration of a reasonable grace period to cease and desist from marketing and selling Oreo Cookies to children in the State of California, until such cookies contain no partially hydrogenated oil or other trans fat."
Related QuestionsWhy did you dismiss the lawsuit?
Ban Trans Fats: The Campaign to Ban Partially Hydrogenated O...First, we had won! Just one day after the media coverage about the lawsuit began, Kraft announced that it would reduce or eliminate the trans fat in the Oreo. There is no point in continuing with a lawsuit when your opponent has agreed to do exactly what you are asking. (See Kraft's progress statement on the home page of this website.) Incidentally, our lawsuit was about marketing to children, including in schools. After we dismissed the lawsuit, Kraft agreed to stop all in-school marketing.
Related QuestionsWhat is a lawsuit, and how much should I sue for?
Larry King Law - Frequently Asked QuestionsIf we are unable to resolve your case through negotiations, and we believe further action is justified, we will bring a lawsuit in your behalf. A civil law suit begins when a document called a Motion for Judgment is filed in a Court. This document states the particulars of your claim.
Related Questions