Search 5,000,000+ questions and answers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Collaborative Law Practice and Mediation?

Frequently Asked Questions - Massachusetts Collaborative Law...
Both Collaborative Law Practice and mediation rely on the voluntary and free exchange of information and a commitment to resolutions that respect the parties' shared goals. In mediation, an impartial third party (the mediator) facilitates the negotiations of the disputing parties and tries to help them settle their case. However, the mediator does not provide legal representation to either party, and cannot be an advocate for either side.
Related Questions

What is the difference between Collaborative Practice and mediation?

Collaborative Practice San Mateo County
In mediation, there is one "neutral" who helps the disputing parties try to settle their case. The mediator cannot give either party legal advice, and cannot help either side advocate its position. If one side or the other becomes unreasonable, lacks negotiating skill, or is emotionally distraught, the mediation can become unbalanced, and if the mediator tries to deal with the problem, the mediator is often seen by one side or the other as biased.
Related Questions

Desonier Mediation
In mediation, an impartial third party (the mediator) facilitates the negotiations of the disputing parties and tries to help them settle their case. A mediator, however, is neutral. As such, the mediator cannot give either party legal advice or be an advocate for either side. If there are lawyers for the parties, they may or may not be present at the mediation sessions. If they are not present, the parties can consult their counsel between mediation sessions.
Related Questions

What is the difference between Collaborative Law and Mediation?

Jennifer Jackson: Family Law Attorney, Collaborative Law and...
In mediation, there is one "neutral" third party who helps the disputing parties try to settle their case. The mediator, who may or may not be a lawyer, cannot give either party legal advice, and cannot be an advocate for either side. If there are lawyers for the parties, they may or may not be present at the negotiation.
Related Questions

Queensland Collaborative lawyers
Mediation involves an independent neutral professional who facilitates discussions between the parties and helps them to reach an agreement. The Mediator does not provide legal advice to either party during the discussions. In collaborative law the lawyers provide advice to their clients and help them assess realistic options. The lawyers then support the clients through the negotiation process to reach an agreement.
Related Questions

The Royalls, Attorneys at Law - Collaborative Law
Under the prevailing model of mediation used in Texas, there is one "neutral" who helps the disputing parties and their lawyers try to settle their case. This ordinarily occurs after the case has been prepared for trial, adversarial discovery has been conducted, and the parties' positions have been "polarized" for forensic presentation to the court.
Related Questions

What's the difference between a mediation and Collaborative Law?

Kincaidmediation.com-- Mediator, Collaborative Attorney, in ...
Collaborative Law is a relatively new hybrid that strives to blend the best of mediation and traditional divorce representation. Like traditional divorce, both parties have their own separate counsel; however, the parties typically follow a process that is guided by many mediation principles. The parties engage in informal discovery. Many of the meetings and negotiations are conducted with the clients present. If experts are necessary, the parties attempt to agree and use a common expert.
Related Questions

What is the difference between Divorce Mediation and "Collaborative Law"?

Mountain States Mediation Services: Frequently Asked Questio...
Collaborative Law is a recent concept where the attorneys agree to represent a divorce client but also insist that they will not continue representation if the case ends up in litigation. In theory the concept is very close to mediation and has had some success in resolving cases out of court. The attorneys are committed to get a resolution that both parties are comfortable with and not endless fighting like an adversarial attorney would do.
Related Questions

What distinguishes Collaborative Law from Mediation?

Collaborative Law Group - FAQS
In mediation, the parties are not represented by attorneys and meet with one person who acts as a mediator in attempting to reach a compromise agreement. Even if the mediator is also an attorney, the mediator cannot give legal advice to either party during the mediation.
Related Questions

How Is Collaborative Law Different From Mediation?

F.A.Q.
Mediation involves the use of a third party neutral in facilitating the negotiation and settlement of a dispute between the parties. Parties can always walk out of mediation and proceed to litigate. In collaborative law cases, lawyers and their clients will talk and negotiate with or without the assistance of a third party neutral, unless they find such an intervention would be useful.
Related Questions

Association of Collaborative Family Law Attorneys Serving We...
Mediation involves the use of a single neutral person (who may be an attorney, a mental health professional, or someone who has an interest in mediating) to facilitate the negotiation and settlement of a dispute between the parties. The mediator's goal is for the parties to reach agreement and, to that end, the parties usually are responsible for negotiate negotiating for themselves.
Related Questions

What is the difference between Collaborative Law Practice and traditional divorce proceedings?

Frequently Asked Questions - Massachusetts Collaborative Law...
In a conventional divorce, one spouse files a complaint for divorce in Court and sets in motion a series of legal steps, such as pretrial discovery, the filing of motions, and a pretrial conference. Although the vast majority of cases filed in Court eventually are settled by agreement (as opposed to a trial), spouses going through a conventional divorce generally come to view each other as adversaries, and their divorce as a battleground.
Related Questions

What is Collaborative Law Practice?

Frequently Asked Questions - Massachusetts Collaborative Law...
Collaborative Law Practice is a dispute resolution process that provides an alternative to conventional litigation. Both parties are represented by counsel, but the parties and their attorneys agree, in writing, to attempt to settle the matter without litigation or even the threat of litigation. Both parties also promise to take a reasoned stand on every issue, to keep discovery informal and cooperative, to retain experts jointly if they are needed, and to negotiate in good faith.
Related Questions

What is a Collaborative Law Practice Group?

Connecticut Collaborative Divorce Lawyers - Collaborative Di...
Collaborative lawyers who have undergone similar training organize themselves into practice groups as a way of ensuring a common basis of professional training, understanding and trust between the practitioners. They frequently meet as a group to problem-solve and discuss unique issues that may arise in a collaboration. This enhances their ability to work together to assist their respective clients when the negotiations become difficult or emotionally-charged.
Related Questions

How is mediation different from collaborative law?

Frequently asked questions (FAQ) from Mediation Services, in...
Mediation is both complementary to and different from collaborative law. In collaborative law, attorneys for opposing parties agree to cooperate to find an agreeable settlement. This is accomplished by bringing both parties and their counsel together in joint meetings, which allows a greater likelihood of compromise than in adversarial litigation.
Related Questions

How does Collaborative Law Practice work?

Frequently Asked Questions - Massachusetts Collaborative Law...
The process of settlement involves each client meeting privately with his or her lawyer and in "four-way" settlement meetings where both clients and both lawyers are present. In some instances experts, such as divorce coaches and child and financial specialists, may join the process at the client's request. Mutual problem-solving and interest-based negotiation (as opposed to adversarial, positional negotiation) by all the parties leads to agreement.
Related Questions

What are the pros and cons of Collaborative Law Practice?

Frequently Asked Questions - Massachusetts Collaborative Law...
Collaborative Law Practice allows parties to negotiate with a lawyer at their side but without the imminent risk of the case proceeding to Court. Furthermore, on average, collaborative law cases tend to be quicker and less expensive for both parties than cases handled without collaborative law, however, this may not be true in every case. Additionally, if negotiations fail, each client will be put to the additional expense of hiring new counsel.
Related Questions

What's better for me traditional representation, mediation or Collaborative Law?

Kincaidmediation.com-- Mediator, Collaborative Attorney, in ...
Although no exact figures are collected, it is safe to say that 80 to 90% of divorces are still accomplished in a traditional legal framework. Although rapidly growing, mediation is still grossly underutilized. Likewise, Collaborative Law has been slow to "catch-on" notwithstanding its considerable advantages. The divorce process is hard, but choosing the right course will greatly impact the extent of the difficulty.
Related Questions

How does collaborative law compare with mediation?

Maryland Collaborative Dispute Resolution Law Professionals ...
Mediation can be a valuable tool for many people. However, often, mediated agreements collapse or require extensive revision when parties take their proposed agreements to attorneys for review prior to signing. Worse, when parties have signed a mediated agreement without an attorney’s prior review, they may find themselves having waived valuable legal rights.
Related Questions

What is the difference between Collaborative Practice and conventional divorce?

Jennifer Jackson: Family Law Attorney, Collaborative Law and...
In conventional divorce, one spouse sues the other for divorce and sets in motion a series of legal steps. These eventually result in a settlement achieved with the involvement of the court. Unfortunately, spouses going through a conventional divorce can come to view each other as adversaries, and their divorce as a battleground. The ensuing conflicts can take an immense toll on the emotions of all the participants, especially the children.
Related Questions

If I choose Collaborative Law Practice, will my rights be protected?

Frequently Asked Questions - Massachusetts Collaborative Law...
Collaborative Law Practice mandates that each party's attorney has an absolute ethical duty to represent solely his or her client's interests. The process does not allow an attorney to be anything less than 100% on the side of his or her client. The Collaborative Law Process recognizes, however, that each party has an interest in resolution and that part of the process is to advance that interest on behalf of each of the clients.
Related Questions

How does Collaborative Law Practice discourage fighting between parties?

Frequently Asked Questions - Massachusetts Collaborative Law...
Collaborative professionals are trained to help clients deal with their issues and emotions in joint meetings and conference calls. They understand how to help clients express authentic hopes and needs effectively. They ask questions that keep the conversation focused on mutually acceptable, workable outcomes.
Related Questions

How does the practice of collaborative law affect attorney fees?

Association of Collaborative Family Law Attorneys Serving We...
Representation and fee agreements between attorney and client are not directly affected by the participation agreement.
Related Questions

What is Collaborative Practice?

Margaret L. Anderson, Attorney: About Collaborative Practice
Collaborative Practice is a way for people to resolve their own disputes in an open and respectful manner, by reaching a mutually acceptable settlement. The parties retain Collaborative Professionals such as attorneys, accountants, financial planners, and therapists, who agree to work cooperatively to gather and share all information needed to reach an agreement.
Related Questions

Jennifer Jackson: Family Law Attorney, Collaborative Law and...
Collaborative Practice is a new way for a divorcing couple to work as a team with trained professionals to resolve disputes respectfully, without going to court. The term encompasses all of the models that have been developed since Minnesota lawyer Stu Webb created the Collaborative Law model in the 1980s. This model is at the heart of all of Collaborative Practice. Each client has the support, protection and guidance of his or her own lawyer.
Related Questions

Collaborative Practice San Mateo County
Collaborative Practice is a new dispute resolution model in which a divorcing couple works as a team with trained professionals to resolve disputes respectfully, without going to court. This team includes attorneys, mental health professionals and financial experts assisting the parties in resolving their conflict through cooperative strategies rather than adversarial techniques and litigation.
Related Questions

What is Collaborative Law?

Minnesota's Family Lawyer Frequently Asked Questions
Collaborative law is a way of practicing law whereby the attorneys for both of the parties in a family dispute agree to assist them in resolving the conflict using cooperative strategies rather than adversarial techniques and litigation. Early non-adversarial participation by the attorneys allows them to use analysis and reasoning to solve problems, generate options and create a positive context for settlement. These attributes are not greatly utilized in the usual adversarial process.
Related Questions

Queensland Collaborative lawyers
Collaborative law is a new approach to resolving disputes arising from marriage or relationship break down. Lawyers and their clients work in a co-operative open way to reach a settlement. In the first instance the clients and lawyers sign a Participation Agreement which sets the structure within which the negotiations will be conducted.
Related Questions

Got A Question? Ask Our Community!


More Questions >>

© Copyright 2007-2008 QueryCAT
About • Webmasters • Contact